

Google’s Matt Cutts let the cat out of the bag at SXSW this year and explained that Google would be rolling out a change to their algorithm that actually penalized overly optimized websites. While he didn’t say what Google was considering “overly optimized”, there has been some speculation as to what it could be.

"Stop trying to game the system...write better stuff"
This will actually be a pretty common find once Google rolls out the change. For years, people have been taught to put their top priority keywords in the title tags of the pages. This wasn’t (and still isn’t) a “spammy” tactic, so hopefully the penalty here won’t be too harsh. The thought process here, however, is that a title tag that is full of keywords isn’t exactly conversational, and therefore hurts the overall usability of the site. For instance, which one of these sounds better to a searcher:
Website Content Management & eCommerce System | Marketpath CMS
OR
Marketpath CMS – The Easiest Damn Content Management System Available
Personally, I’d click through on #2, and I’d be willing to bet I’m not the only one. However, traditional onsite SEO (at least the past 5 years of it) would laugh at that title tag. Using words like “the” “damn” and “available” would be an amateur mistake. These words are filler words that don’t help my keyword strategy.
Other onsite items to review once the change goes live are things like internal links that all utilize the same anchor text, page structure that doesn’t make sense other than to create more places for keywords, and snippets of text that appeal more to search engines rather than users.
If you’ve contracted with an external search engine optimization firm, there is a good chance that they have built links to your site to boost rankings. While there has already been a decrease in the importance of links in the overall ranking algorithm, sites with unnatural link profiles may be penalized even further with this update. I’d be willing to guess that 999 times out of 1000, sites with unnatural link profiles have contracted out and bought links (either directly or indirectly), which is technically against the Google Terms of Service, so it’s only fair to get penalized.
The thought process here is a natural one. Google’s goal is to deliver the most relevant content for a search query. The most relevant content isn’t always delivered because other, less relevant sites may be optimized to rank better. Removing links from the algorithm and replacing them with other signals might help Google finally achieve what they are trying to do – rank content based on quality, not technical SEO.
Whether or not you agree that sites that are overly optimized should be penalized (we’ve had that argument internally), the change is coming. The best thing you can do at this moment for your site’s well-being hasn’t changed, however. Keep an eye on the changes as they are rolled out, read some blogs about those changes, and modify your strategy accordingly. The heart of your strategy will remain constant, focusing on good content creation and marketing
The purpose of most well-crafted business websites is to convert visitors into sales leads (or customers, if your site is ecommerce). There are many aspects that go into engaging your website's visitors and convincing them to give you their information. Some of these aspects are easy to modify and test, like the placement, size and color of call to action buttons. Others are a little more difficult and costly, such as an overall website design change. However, the element that your site relies on to convert visitors to leads, the form itself, may be hurting your website's ability to do its job. Is your form actually discouraging visitors from filling it out? Here are a few elements of your web form to check.
New visitors to your website don't necessarily trust you yet, so don't expect them to give you the keys to the castle. Chances are you don't need to know all of the information about a potential customer to start a conversation about your product or service. If you can get away with just learning their name and email address, perhaps a phone number, then go for it.
Even if you're not requiring each form field to be filled out to submit the form, seeing a large form can be discouraging. Does knowing a client's location really help you prior to speaking with them? If not, eliminate the field all together and see if the amount of submissions increases. Try this with other fields that may not be necessary (Fax number, address, multiple phone numbers, title, etc.).
Eliminate the "How much is your budget for this project" question. Yes, qualifying leads is important; however, this goes back to the trust issue of your website and a potential client. Chances are they don't want to tell you how much money they have until they've at least talked with you. There is a good chance your budget question has discouraged a qualified lead from contacting you. Check out this case study done by ClickTale that shows a 20% form abandonment rate due to a budget question.
The takeaway from this article should be a desire to test new formats for your web collect forms to increase conversion rates. Test, analyze, rinse and repeat until you have found the perfect balance for your web form.
Do you have experience testing your web forms? If so, what are your favorite tools? Leave your feedback in the comments below.